
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.8%Merrimack
55.2%Marist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarist -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL132.5
MODEL MONEYLINEMarist -123

Marist
19-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 64
Projected Total132.5
Projected ScoreMarist 68
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index51
106.4Offensive Efficiency104.3
103.2Defensive Efficiency95.6
3.2Net Efficiency8.7
0.7Strength of Schedule-3.2
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
64.4Tempo66.8
49.3%Effective FG%49.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.8%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
39.5%Free Throw Rate26.1%
2.1Average Margin5.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–51.0), offensive efficiency (106.4–104.3), strength of schedule (0.7–-3.2), recent form (12.9–2.9).
Marist COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (95.6–103.2), net efficiency (8.7–3.2), shooting efficiency (49.9–49.3).