New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

33.5%New Hampshire

66.5%Maine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMaine -4.9

PROJECTED TOTAL136.1

MODEL MONEYLINEMaine -199

Maine

8-24

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 66

Projected Total136.1

Projected ScoreMaine 70

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricMaine

34MMH Power Index35.6

99.6Offensive Efficiency95.6

107.5Defensive Efficiency104.6

-7.9Net Efficiency-9.0

-3.4Strength of Schedule-1.8

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.8

69.4Tempo65.4

47.6%Effective FG%50.5%

16.1%Turnover Rate19.0%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %19.4%

29.4%Free Throw Rate38.5%

-5.5Average Margin-5.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Maine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMaine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.6–34.0), defensive efficiency (104.6–107.5), strength of schedule (-1.8–-3.4), recent form (-6.8–-17.6).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (99.6–95.6), net efficiency (-7.9–-9.0), ball security (16.1–19.0).

Final

New Hampshire

65—48

Maine

New Hampshire by 17 • 64.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATMaine

26-59FG14-41

44.0%FG%34.0%

5-183PT1-14

28.0%3PT%7.0%

8-15FT19-23

53.0%FT%83.0%

39Rebounds25

11Offensive Rebounds1

15Assists6

9Turnovers13

7Steals5

2Blocks5

21Fouls16

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Belal El Shakery	F	28	4-12	0-0	3-6	7	0	1	0	11
Davide Poser	F	30	3-10	2-6	2-4	4	2	1	1	10
Tyler Bike	G	29	4-7	2-5	0-0	4	4	2	0	10
John Squire	F	28	5-7	0-0	0-1	8	0	0	1	10
Comeh Emuobor	G	17	4-8	0-0	1-2	5	1	0	0	9
Jack Graham	G	17	2-5	0-3	2-2	2	2	3	0	6
Giannos Xanthopoulos	C	6	2-3	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
R.J. Kennedy	G	30	1-4	0-2	0-0	4	3	0	0	2
KiJan Robinson	G	14	1-3	0-1	0-0	3	3	0	0	2
Dylan Saunders	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Maine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keelan Steele	F	19	4-6	0-0	1-1	8	0	0	1	9
TJ Biel	F	34	3-8	0-3	2-2	2	1	0	3	8
Mekhi Gray	G	16	2-2	0-0	3-3	2	1	0	1	7
Logan Carey	G	30	0-8	0-2	5-6	2	1	2	0	5
Bashir N'Galang	G	14	2-2	0-0	1-3	3	1	0	0	5
Ryan Mabrey	G	32	1-3	1-3	1-2	1	1	0	0	4
Caleb Crawford	G	22	1-4	0-3	2-2	0	0	2	0	4
Ace Flagg	F	16	0-5	0-2	4-4	4	0	1	0	4
Amare Allen	F	15	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Isaac Bonilla	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.0Possessions64.0

101.6Offensive Efficiency75.0

75.0Defensive Efficiency101.6

26.6Net Efficiency-26.6

48.3%Effective FG%35.4%

49.1%True Shooting %46.2%

14.0%Turnover Rate20.3%

25.4%Free Throw Rate56.1%

30.5%3-Point Rate34.1%

1.67Assist / Turnover0.46

Game Summary

New Hampshire won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 64.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.