UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
92.2%UMBC
7.8%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -14.2
PROJECTED TOTAL137.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -1182
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUMBC 76
Projected Total137.4
Projected ScoreBinghamton 62

Team Comparison

59.1MMH Power Index32.4
113.0Offensive Efficiency102.2
99.0Defensive Efficiency112.3
14.0Net Efficiency-10.1
-5.6Strength of Schedule-6.0
24.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
65.5Tempo64.2
54.3%Effective FG%51.3%
14.3%Turnover Rate18.5%
25.2%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
34.1%Free Throw Rate42.8%
9.1Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (113.0–102.2), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.3), net efficiency (14.0–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–34.1).
Final
UMBC logo
UMBC
78—60
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
UMBC by 18 • 63.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMBCTEAM STATBinghamton
31-57FG24-55
54.0%FG%44.0%
7-163PT5-15
44.0%3PT%33.0%
9-12FT7-15
75.0%FT%47.0%
33Rebounds30
4Offensive Rebounds7
11Assists8
5Turnovers8
6Steals3
2Blocks1
17Fouls11

Player Box Score

UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jah'Likai KingG338-152-43-440100021
Caden DiggsF266-112-50-030100014
Ace ValentineG356-81-30-074100013
DJ Armstrong Jr.G352-71-25-542220010
Jose Roberto TanchynF244-50-00-07200008
Josh OdunowoF182-50-01-33200005
Cougar DowningG171-31-20-01110003
Riley JacobsF81-20-00-01000002
Daylon DickersonF41-10-00-00000002
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wes Peterson Jr.G407-152-72-282000018
Zyier BeverlyF218-120-02-550010018
Jackson BenigniG394-73-60-020000011
Stephan SnaggF172-20-01-30010005
Jeremiah QuigleyG332-90-00-06500004
Bryson WilsonG221-60-11-35110003
Ryan RichardsonG280-40-11-24010001

Advanced Game Stats

63.4Possessions63.4
123.0Offensive Efficiency94.6
94.6Defensive Efficiency123.0
28.4Net Efficiency-28.4
60.5%Effective FG%48.2%
62.2%True Shooting %48.3%
7.8%Turnover Rate12.7%
21.1%Free Throw Rate27.3%
28.1%3-Point Rate27.3%
2.20Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
UMBC won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 63.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.