East Texas A&M

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.1%East Texas A&M

76.9%Incarnate Word

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADIncarnate Word -8.5

PROJECTED TOTAL147.5

MODEL MONEYLINEIncarnate Word -333

Incarnate Word

12-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 70

Projected Total147.5

Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 78

Team Comparison

East Texas A&MMetricIncarnate Word

38.4MMH Power Index44.6

101.2Offensive Efficiency112.0

107.5Defensive Efficiency111.2

-6.3Net Efficiency0.8

-1.5Strength of Schedule-3.6

-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5

69.3Tempo66.3

50.7%Effective FG%52.2%

18.7%Turnover Rate16.8%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %34.4%

31.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

-4.3Average Margin0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Incarnate Word HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIncarnate Word holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.6–38.4), offensive efficiency (112.0–101.2), net efficiency (0.8–-6.3), recent form (-8.5–-9.1).

East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.5–111.2), strength of schedule (-1.5–-3.6).

Final

East Texas A&M

80—58

Incarnate Word

East Texas A&M by 22 • 60.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Texas A&MTEAM STATIncarnate Word

30-54FG20-61

56.0%FG%33.0%

8-213PT4-21

38.0%3PT%19.0%

12-17FT14-16

71.0%FT%88.0%

34Rebounds31

8Offensive Rebounds14

15Assists8

6Turnovers6

4Steals4

2Blocks1

15Fouls11

Player Box Score

East Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Damian Garcia	G	39	6-12	2-6	3-3	7	0	1	0	17
Noah Pagotto	F	27	7-12	1-3	1-1	4	2	0	2	16
Gianni Hunt	G	35	5-8	1-3	4-4	3	7	0	0	15
Ronnie Harrison	F	38	6-11	0-2	0-4	8	3	3	0	12
Tay Mosher	F	33	3-7	3-5	2-3	6	2	0	0	11
London Fields	G	15	1-1	1-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	5
Michael Folarin	F	7	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Evan Phelps	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Josh Taylor	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Incarnate Word

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tahj Staveskie	G	33	5-17	2-7	5-6	4	2	1	0	17
Love Bettis	G	25	6-15	1-4	0-0	3	2	1	0	13
Davion Bailey	G	33	2-8	0-4	6-6	4	0	0	0	10
Harold Woods	G	30	2-6	0-2	3-4	5	3	0	0	7
Harrison Reede	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Esteban Mann	F	15	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Lewis Rowe	C	13	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	1	2
Marcus Glover	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Amani Drummond	G	6	1-4	0-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Jordan Pyke	F	20	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jayden Williams	C	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.4Possessions60.4

132.5Offensive Efficiency96.0

96.0Defensive Efficiency132.5

36.4Net Efficiency-36.4

63.0%Effective FG%36.1%

64.4%True Shooting %42.3%

10.0%Turnover Rate9.9%

31.5%Free Throw Rate26.2%

38.9%3-Point Rate34.4%

2.50Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

East Texas A&M won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 60.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.