
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.8%Columbia
88.2%Yale
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADYale -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.0
MODEL MONEYLINEYale -747

Yale
23-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 68
Projected Total149.0
Projected ScoreYale 81
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index65.4
112.4Offensive Efficiency121.4
105.2Defensive Efficiency105.8
7.2Net Efficiency15.6
-1.7Strength of Schedule1.6
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9
68.2Tempo64.5
54.4%Effective FG%56.8%
19.1%Turnover Rate13.9%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
28.8%Free Throw Rate34.4%
5.0Average Margin10.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Yale HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–51.9), offensive efficiency (121.4–112.4), net efficiency (15.6–7.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-1.7).
Columbia COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.2–105.8), offensive rebounding (37.3–33.3).