Manhattan

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.0%Manhattan

86.0%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -13.0

PROJECTED TOTAL152.2

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -614

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreManhattan 70

Projected Total152.2

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 83

Team Comparison

ManhattanMetricQuinnipiac

39.3MMH Power Index51

107.1Offensive Efficiency106.8

114.2Defensive Efficiency102.1

-7.1Net Efficiency4.7

-3.6Strength of Schedule-2.3

-3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

69.1Tempo70.5

48.5%Effective FG%48.9%

15.4%Turnover Rate15.6%

29.8%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

34.8%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-4.9Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–39.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–114.2), net efficiency (4.7–-7.1), strength of schedule (-2.3–-3.6).

Manhattan COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.1–106.8), ball security (15.4–15.6), free throw rate (34.8–34.1).

Final

Manhattan

92—98

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 6 • 80.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ManhattanTEAM STATQuinnipiac

31-71FG33-66

44.0%FG%50.0%

9-203PT11-24

45.0%3PT%46.0%

21-23FT21-32

91.0%FT%66.0%

31Rebounds39

12Offensive Rebounds15

11Assists19

11Turnovers13

12Steals7

6Blocks5

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Manhattan

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Devin Dinkins	G	41	8-15	4-7	5-5	2	4	2	0	25
Jaden Winston	G	42	7-15	3-4	3-4	5	1	5	0	20
Terrance Jones	G	37	4-11	2-5	4-4	4	2	1	1	14
Anthony Isaac	F	38	4-11	0-0	5-6	13	3	2	0	13
Fraser Roxburgh	F	41	4-14	0-4	4-4	4	1	1	2	12
Quron Elliott	G	5	3-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Erik Oliver-Bush	G	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	2	2
Marko Ljubicic	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Asim Jones	G	42	9-15	6-9	6-6	5	5	3	0	30
Jaden Zimmerman	G	39	6-14	2-6	3-5	1	7	0	1	17
Grant Randall	F	42	5-11	1-5	3-4	8	2	0	2	14
Amarri Monroe	F	25	3-8	1-1	6-8	7	1	2	0	13
Keith McKnight	G	33	5-8	0-0	1-4	12	2	0	1	11
Spence Wewe	F	21	3-4	0-0	0-1	5	0	0	1	6
Nate Guerengomba	G	13	1-3	0-0	2-4	1	0	2	0	4
Tai Turnage	G	10	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

80.1Possessions80.1

114.9Offensive Efficiency122.3

122.3Defensive Efficiency114.9

-7.5Net Efficiency7.5

50.0%Effective FG%58.3%

56.1%True Shooting %60.3%

13.6%Turnover Rate16.4%

32.4%Free Throw Rate48.5%

28.2%3-Point Rate36.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.46

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 80.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.