SE Louisiana

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.2%SE Louisiana

91.8%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -15.9

PROJECTED TOTAL137.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -1120

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSE Louisiana 61

Projected Total137.1

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76

Team Comparison

SE LouisianaMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

38.7MMH Power Index55.8

98.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

106.4Defensive Efficiency103.1

-8.0Net Efficiency9.5

0.2Strength of Schedule-1.9

-11.9Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

63.9Tempo67.4

47.0%Effective FG%55.7%

18.5%Turnover Rate17.9%

29.4%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

38.9%Free Throw Rate29.6%

-5.1Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–38.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–98.4), defensive efficiency (103.1–106.4), net efficiency (9.5–-8.0).

SE Louisiana COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (29.4–29.2), free throw rate (38.9–29.6).

Final

SE Louisiana

65—68

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 3 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SE LouisianaTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

23-57FG22-52

40.0%FG%42.0%

7-233PT7-27

30.0%3PT%26.0%

12-18FT17-25

67.0%FT%68.0%

35Rebounds37

9Offensive Rebounds9

18Assists17

10Turnovers10

5Steals4

2Blocks1

23Fouls16

Player Box Score

SE Louisiana

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremy Elyzee	F	26	4-8	0-0	6-7	4	1	2	0	14
Isaiah Gaines	F	34	6-9	0-1	1-2	11	2	0	2	13
Jaiden Lawrence	G	23	4-7	3-6	0-0	2	1	1	0	11
Ethan Pickett	G	29	2-4	0-0	4-6	5	5	0	0	8
Peter Hemschemeier	G	28	3-12	1-5	0-0	1	3	0	0	7
Makhi Myles	F	20	2-6	2-4	0-1	2	0	2	0	6
Jalen Forrest	G	14	1-3	0-2	1-2	2	2	0	0	3
Kyle Edison	G	9	1-5	1-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
CJ Booker	PG	10	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Ubong-Abasi Etim	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Garrett Shoemaker	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marvin McGhee III	G	37	5-12	5-11	4-4	11	1	1	0	19
Koree Cotton	G	21	4-6	0-1	7-8	3	1	1	0	15
Filip Brankovic	F	24	6-12	0-2	1-2	5	4	0	0	13
Jaylen Washington	G	35	3-7	1-2	2-4	2	6	2	0	9
Julien Gomez	G	28	2-4	1-3	1-3	5	1	0	0	6
Kwo Agwa	F	15	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Jalen Ricks	G	14	0-3	0-2	2-2	0	0	0	1	2
Demarris Winters	G	3	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Zae Blake	G	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Always Wright	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Dane Christensen	F	3	0-1	0-1	0-2	0	0	0	0	0
Marshal Destremau	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

98.8Offensive Efficiency103.3

103.3Defensive Efficiency98.8

-4.6Net Efficiency4.6

46.5%Effective FG%49.0%

49.6%True Shooting %53.2%

15.0%Turnover Rate15.4%

31.6%Free Throw Rate48.1%

40.4%3-Point Rate51.9%

1.80Assist / Turnover1.70

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.