
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
87.1%Florida A&M
12.9%Mississippi Valley State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -11.6
PROJECTED TOTAL146.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -675

Mississippi Valley State
3-30MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 79
Projected Total146.7
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 68
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index17.7
98.7Offensive Efficiency91.1
105.6Defensive Efficiency117.8
-6.9Net Efficiency-26.7
-3.2Strength of Schedule-4.1
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.3
70.6Tempo70.5
49.2%Effective FG%45.8%
21.6%Turnover Rate21.8%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %26.5%
38.0%Free Throw Rate34.5%
-4.8Average Margin-18.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Florida A&M HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (39.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (98.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (105.6–117.8), net efficiency (-6.9–-26.7).