Pepperdine

9-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.0%Pepperdine

99.0%Gonzaga

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGonzaga -31.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -9900

Gonzaga

31-4

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePepperdine 61

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScoreGonzaga 93

Team Comparison

PepperdineMetricGonzaga

38.2MMH Power Index76.4

103.2Offensive Efficiency119.7

113.6Defensive Efficiency94.0

-10.4Net Efficiency25.7

0.7Strength of Schedule3.0

-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency18.2

70.0Tempo70.4

48.7%Effective FG%55.7%

18.3%Turnover Rate13.6%

31.1%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

34.0%Free Throw Rate31.5%

-7.3Average Margin18.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–38.2), offensive efficiency (119.7–103.2), defensive efficiency (94.0–113.6), net efficiency (25.7–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.0–31.5).

Final

Pepperdine

60—84

Gonzaga

Gonzaga by 24 • 69.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PepperdineTEAM STATGonzaga

22-58FG31-66

38.0%FG%47.0%

3-223PT5-20

14.0%3PT%25.0%

13-14FT17-24

93.0%FT%71.0%

34Rebounds42

10Offensive Rebounds15

11Assists9

15Turnovers7

5Steals10

4Blocks4

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Styles Phipps	G	27	3-5	0-1	7-7	4	3	1	0	13
Aaron Clark	G	33	4-13	1-5	1-2	3	4	1	0	10
Pavle Stošic	F	13	3-4	0-1	3-3	5	1	0	0	9
Stefan Cicic	C	16	3-7	0-1	2-2	3	0	1	1	8
Danilo Dožic	C	25	3-5	1-3	0-0	3	1	1	1	7
Luka Vudragovic	G	20	2-6	1-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Vladimir Sudar	F	4	2-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Javon Cooley	G	20	1-6	0-4	0-0	5	0	1	1	2
Yonatan Levy	F	18	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
David Mager	G	17	0-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	1	0
Pasha Shemirani	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Gonzaga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Davis Fogle	G	26	4-8	1-1	8-10	3	4	0	0	17
Mario Saint-Supery	G	20	4-7	2-4	2-2	5	1	5	0	12
Tyon Grant-Foster	G	16	4-9	0-0	4-4	3	0	2	0	12
Adam Miller	G	18	5-11	1-6	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Noah Haaland	F	11	4-4	0-0	2-2	4	0	0	0	10
Braeden Smith	G	20	4-7	0-0	0-1	1	2	1	0	8
Jalen Warley	G	21	2-3	0-0	1-2	4	1	0	0	5
Steele Venters	G	19	2-8	1-6	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Emmanuel Innocenti	F	24	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	0	2	1	2
Ismaila Diagne	C	20	1-4	0-0	0-1	10	0	0	3	2
Cade Orness	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-2	1	0	0	0	0
Joaquim ArauzMoore	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.6Possessions69.6

86.2Offensive Efficiency120.7

120.7Defensive Efficiency86.2

-34.5Net Efficiency34.5

40.5%Effective FG%50.8%

46.4%True Shooting %54.3%

21.5%Turnover Rate10.1%

24.1%Free Throw Rate36.4%

37.9%3-Point Rate30.3%

0.73Assist / Turnover1.29

Game Summary

Gonzaga won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 69.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.