Utah logo

Utah

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.1%Utah
93.9%BYU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -18.5
PROJECTED TOTAL159.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -1539
BYU logo

BYU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah 71
Projected Total159.7
Projected ScoreBYU 89

Team Comparison

UtahMetricBYU
43.9MMH Power Index63.9
108.8Offensive Efficiency118.3
115.8Defensive Efficiency106.8
-7.0Net Efficiency11.5
5.1Strength of Schedule6.5
-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.2
68.3Tempo70.6
52.3%Effective FG%54.7%
16.7%Turnover Rate15.2%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
32.2%Free Throw Rate35.4%
-4.8Average Margin8.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

BYU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–43.9), offensive efficiency (118.3–108.8), defensive efficiency (106.8–115.8), net efficiency (11.5–-7.0).
Final
Utah logo
Utah
78—91
BYU logo
BYU
BYU by 13 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UtahTEAM STATBYU
27-59FG32-60
46.0%FG%53.0%
13-213PT8-19
62.0%3PT%42.0%
11-11FT19-23
100.0%FT%83.0%
24Rebounds40
6Offensive Rebounds14
17Assists17
6Turnovers8
4Steals5
2Blocks5
19Fouls13

Player Box Score

Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Keanu DawesF337-104-55-561000023
Terrence BrownG327-144-44-414000022
Don McHenryG327-142-30-024200016
Kendyl SandersF202-42-22-22101008
Seydou TraoreF283-111-70-06200007
James OkonkwoF261-10-00-05101002
Josh HayesF140-20-00-00000000
Obomate AbbeyG140-30-00-00420000
Jerry HuangG10-00-00-00000000
BYU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
AJ DybantsaF3615-244-59-1063010043
Robert Wright IIIG366-112-37-853100021
Richie SaundersG314-131-53-432100012
Keba KeitaF213-30-00-17101006
Abdullah AhmedC173-30-00-03301006
Mihailo BoškovicF151-21-20-03210003
Khadim MboupF210-00-00-06112000
Kennard Davis Jr.F110-20-20-01210000
Aleksej KosticG70-10-10-00000000
Dominique DiomandeF30-00-00-00000000
Tyler MrusF10-00-00-01000000
Jared McGregorG10-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6
120.7Offensive Efficiency140.9
140.9Defensive Efficiency120.7
-20.1Net Efficiency20.1
56.8%Effective FG%60.0%
60.7%True Shooting %64.2%
9.3%Turnover Rate12.3%
18.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
35.6%3-Point Rate31.7%
2.83Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
BYU won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.