
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.2%Tennessee
64.8%Alabama
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -184

Alabama
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 81
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreAlabama 85
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index69.5
115.8Offensive Efficiency121.6
102.1Defensive Efficiency111.2
13.7Net Efficiency10.4
7.8Strength of Schedule9.4
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5
68.1Tempo74.7
51.6%Effective FG%54.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate13.0%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
38.6%Free Throw Rate36.9%
9.3Average Margin7.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–68.6), offensive efficiency (121.6–115.8), strength of schedule (9.4–7.8), recent form (9.5–3.3).
Tennessee COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–111.2), net efficiency (13.7–10.4), offensive rebounding (44.5–32.1).