Louisville logo

Louisville

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.6%Louisville
89.4%Duke
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuke -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL153.2
MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -843
Duke logo

Duke

35-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisville 70
Projected Total153.2
Projected ScoreDuke 83

Team Comparison

67.1MMH Power Index81.7
118.6Offensive Efficiency122.2
102.2Defensive Efficiency95.2
16.4Net Efficiency27.0
6.0Strength of Schedule7.8
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7
71.0Tempo66.8
56.9%Effective FG%56.9%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.9%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %38.2%
34.1%Free Throw Rate39.0%
11.7Average Margin18.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–67.1), offensive efficiency (122.2–118.6), defensive efficiency (95.2–102.2), net efficiency (27.0–16.4).
Final
Louisville logo
Louisville
52—83
Duke logo
Duke
Duke by 31 • 64.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LouisvilleTEAM STATDuke
16-54FG31-61
30.0%FG%51.0%
11-343PT8-23
32.0%3PT%35.0%
9-13FT13-18
69.0%FT%72.0%
26Rebounds47
9Offensive Rebounds15
11Assists14
12Turnovers12
6Steals7
3Blocks1
17Fouls12

Player Box Score

Louisville
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan ConwellG377-144-90-033200018
J'Vonne HadleyG293-102-63-550100011
Mikel Brown Jr.G341-131-74-62400007
Isaac McKneelyG292-62-50-02110006
Sananda FruF241-30-02-24212004
Adrian WooleyG231-51-40-03000003
Aly KhalifaC111-31-30-01100003
Vangelis ZougrisF100-00-00-01011000
Kobe RodgersG30-00-00-00000000
Duke
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron BoozerF318-161-42-4104000019
Isaiah EvansG265-112-83-340000015
Patrick Ngongba IIC245-80-15-552210015
Nikolas KhameniaG155-63-41-120100014
Caleb FosterG312-62-31-44200007
Cayden BoozerG203-50-01-14210007
Maliq BrownF192-40-00-07220004
Dame SarrG271-30-20-05200002
Darren HarrisG50-20-10-00010000
Jack ScottG10-00-00-02000000
Cameron SheffieldG10-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.9Possessions64.9
80.1Offensive Efficiency127.9
127.9Defensive Efficiency80.1
-47.8Net Efficiency47.8
39.8%Effective FG%57.4%
43.2%True Shooting %59.7%
19.0%Turnover Rate18.0%
24.1%Free Throw Rate29.5%
63.0%3-Point Rate37.7%
0.92Assist / Turnover1.17
Game Summary
Duke won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 64.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.