Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
76.2%Purdue
23.8%Indiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -320
Indiana logo

Indiana

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePurdue 79
Projected Total153.6
Projected ScoreIndiana 74

Team Comparison

73.2MMH Power Index58.2
124.8Offensive Efficiency116.0
107.8Defensive Efficiency107.1
17.0Net Efficiency8.9
7.6Strength of Schedule5.2
11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.7
65.4Tempo67.4
57.8%Effective FG%56.0%
13.7%Turnover Rate15.1%
36.2%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
29.1%Free Throw Rate35.8%
11.1Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–58.2), offensive efficiency (124.8–116.0), net efficiency (17.0–8.9), strength of schedule (7.6–5.2).
Indiana COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.1–107.8), free throw rate (35.8–29.1).
Final
Purdue logo
Purdue
67—72
Indiana logo
Indiana
Indiana by 5 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATIndiana
26-54FG23-50
48.0%FG%46.0%
7-203PT12-33
35.0%3PT%36.0%
8-15FT14-19
53.0%FT%74.0%
33Rebounds28
9Offensive Rebounds6
13Assists16
10Turnovers8
5Steals8
2Blocks1
16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trey Kaufman-RennF299-140-05-1033000023
Braden SmithG396-142-80-055200014
Fletcher LoyerG323-102-60-03200008
C.J. CoxG283-42-30-03010008
Jack BenterG182-31-20-06000005
Daniel JacobsenC131-20-01-25112003
Oscar CluffC191-40-00-16100002
Gicarri HarrisG150-10-02-20010002
Omer MayerG71-20-10-01100002
Indiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lamar WilkersonG367-182-93-473000019
Nick DornG326-114-92-220300018
Tucker DeVriesF343-73-70-210331009
Reed BaileyF263-40-03-52100009
Conor EnrightG402-52-52-22810008
Jasai MilesG151-31-22-22100005
Sam AlexisF141-10-00-01010002
Trent SisleyF30-10-12-20000002

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6
108.8Offensive Efficiency116.9
116.9Defensive Efficiency108.8
-8.1Net Efficiency8.1
54.6%Effective FG%58.0%
54.8%True Shooting %61.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate13.1%
27.8%Free Throw Rate38.0%
37.0%3-Point Rate66.0%
1.30Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
Indiana won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.