
Kentucky
22-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.6%Kentucky
74.4%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL161.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -291

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKentucky 77
Projected Total161.6
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 85
Team Comparison
63.9MMH Power Index68.9
115.2Offensive Efficiency120.9
106.3Defensive Efficiency105.7
8.9Net Efficiency15.2
8.7Strength of Schedule7.4
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.9Tempo70.9
53.2%Effective FG%55.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate13.5%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
38.0%Free Throw Rate39.3%
6.2Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–63.9), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.3), net efficiency (15.2–8.9).
Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (8.7–7.4), offensive rebounding (33.2–30.8).