Notre Dame logo

Notre Dame

13-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.7%Notre Dame
98.3%Duke
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuke -27.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.4
MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -5782
Duke logo

Duke

35-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNotre Dame 61
Projected Total149.4
Projected ScoreDuke 88

Team Comparison

49.7MMH Power Index81.7
110.3Offensive Efficiency122.2
111.2Defensive Efficiency95.2
-0.9Net Efficiency27.0
4.7Strength of Schedule7.8
-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7
68.0Tempo66.8
53.0%Effective FG%56.9%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.9%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %38.2%
34.7%Free Throw Rate39.0%
-0.6Average Margin18.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–49.7), offensive efficiency (122.2–110.3), defensive efficiency (95.2–111.2), net efficiency (27.0–-0.9).
Final
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
78—86
Duke logo
Duke
Duke by 8 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATDuke
27-57FG24-45
47.0%FG%53.0%
14-243PT8-24
58.0%3PT%33.0%
10-16FT30-35
63.0%FT%86.0%
21Rebounds34
5Offensive Rebounds7
15Assists17
7Turnovers8
3Steals2
1Blocks1
27Fouls17

Player Box Score

Notre Dame
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Markus BurtonG348-174-63-452010023
Braeden ShrewsberryG385-83-41-434000014
Tae DavisF324-111-22-242000011
Sir MohammedG154-72-41-221000011
Matt AlloccoGuard372-72-62-22310008
J.R. KoniecznyF192-52-20-01100006
Kebba NjieF152-20-01-22110005
Julian Roper IIGuard60-00-00-00110000
Garrett SundraF40-00-00-00000000
Duke
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cooper FlaggForward3611-144-616-1767100042
Khaman MaluachCenter326-70-07-8100010019
Kon KnueppelGuard343-82-75-635000013
Sion JamesGuard301-41-21-24300004
Tyrese ProctorGuard281-61-50-02110003
Mason GillisForward181-10-01-24100003
Patrick Ngongba IIC51-10-00-01000002
Caleb FosterG100-30-30-00000000
Isaiah EvansG60-10-10-00000000
Maliq BrownF10-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6
120.7Offensive Efficiency133.1
133.1Defensive Efficiency120.7
-12.4Net Efficiency12.4
59.6%Effective FG%62.2%
60.4%True Shooting %69.8%
10.5%Turnover Rate12.8%
28.1%Free Throw Rate77.8%
42.1%3-Point Rate53.3%
2.14Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Duke won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.