UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.3%UCLA
25.7%Oregon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -5.6
PROJECTED TOTAL147.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -289
Oregon logo

Oregon

12-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 77
Projected Total147.6
Projected ScoreOregon 71

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index48.9
115.9Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.9Defensive Efficiency110.7
9.0Net Efficiency-4.3
5.1Strength of Schedule6.0
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
66.5Tempo66.7
53.5%Effective FG%49.9%
13.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %31.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.0Average Margin-2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–48.9), offensive efficiency (115.9–106.4), defensive efficiency (106.9–110.7), net efficiency (9.0–-4.3).
Oregon COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.0–5.1), offensive rebounding (31.6–30.7), free throw rate (36.9–33.8).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
73—57
Oregon logo
Oregon
UCLA by 16 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATOregon
23-58FG21-59
40.0%FG%36.0%
7-183PT9-32
39.0%3PT%28.0%
20-23FT6-9
87.0%FT%67.0%
40Rebounds36
12Offensive Rebounds11
10Assists9
4Turnovers10
4Steals2
4Blocks2
13Fouls17

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler BilodeauF334-91-29-1171000018
Donovan DentG376-171-32-234100015
Eric Dailey Jr.G335-131-23-3111110014
Trent PerryG363-102-54-423100012
Xavier BookerF192-21-12-26012007
Jamar BrownG121-41-40-02000003
Brandon WilliamsG161-20-10-14000002
Steven Jamerson IIF121-10-00-03101002
Eric FreenyG20-00-00-00000000
Oregon
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kwame Evans Jr.F399-184-102-382120024
Jamari PhillipsG313-113-100-02100009
Dezdrick LindsayF283-71-30-06000007
Sean StewartF292-80-02-28310006
Drew CarterG221-21-20-02100003
Wei LinG201-60-41-21100003
Oleksandr KobzystyiF121-30-20-01000002
Luke JohnsonF111-40-10-04100002
Efe VatanF20-00-01-21000001
Devon PryorF60-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6
118.5Offensive Efficiency92.5
92.5Defensive Efficiency118.5
26.0Net Efficiency-26.0
45.7%Effective FG%43.2%
53.0%True Shooting %45.0%
6.6%Turnover Rate16.1%
39.7%Free Throw Rate15.3%
31.0%3-Point Rate54.2%
2.50Assist / Turnover0.90
Game Summary
UCLA won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.