Duke logo

Duke

35-3
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
89.7%Duke
10.3%Virginia Tech
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuke -12.5
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -871
Virginia Tech logo

Virginia Tech

19-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuke 82
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreVirginia Tech 69

Team Comparison

81.7MMH Power Index57.7
122.2Offensive Efficiency112.8
95.2Defensive Efficiency107.2
27.0Net Efficiency5.6
7.8Strength of Schedule5.8
18.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9
66.8Tempo69.8
56.9%Effective FG%52.3%
15.9%Turnover Rate14.9%
38.2%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
39.0%Free Throw Rate34.7%
18.0Average Margin3.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–57.7), offensive efficiency (122.2–112.8), defensive efficiency (95.2–107.2), net efficiency (27.0–5.6).
Virginia Tech COUNTERS WITHball security (14.9–15.9).
Final
Duke logo
Duke
7258
Virginia Tech logo
Virginia Tech
Duke by 1457.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DukeTEAM STATVirginia Tech
31-59FG23-55
53.0%FG%42.0%
5-213PT7-26
24.0%3PT%27.0%
5-7FT5-6
71.0%FT%83.0%
33Rebounds26
12Offensive Rebounds11
15Assists11
8Turnovers10
7Steals6
2Blocks2
13Fouls12

Player Box Score

Duke
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron BoozerF379-122-34-585100024
Isaiah EvansG235-110-41-100000011
Maliq BrownF195-101-40-131300011
Patrick Ngongba IIC244-71-20-05212009
Caleb FosterG263-71-30-07400007
Cayden BoozerG283-60-10-01210006
Nikolas KhameniaG301-20-10-05110002
Darren HarrisG51-10-00-00000002
Dame SarrG80-30-30-01000000
Virginia Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amani HansberryF378-134-50-032000020
Jailen BedfordG335-120-52-232000012
Ben HammondG405-121-50-052300011
Jaden SchuttG182-42-40-00000006
Neoklis AvdalasG291-80-43-44400005
Tobi LawalF312-50-30-04132004
Christian GurdakC100-10-00-01000000
Antonio DornC20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

57.6Possessions57.6
125.0Offensive Efficiency100.7
100.7Defensive Efficiency125.0
24.3Net Efficiency-24.3
56.8%Effective FG%48.2%
57.8%True Shooting %50.1%
13.7%Turnover Rate17.6%
11.9%Free Throw Rate10.9%
35.6%3-Point Rate47.3%
1.88Assist / Turnover1.10
Game Summary
Duke won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 57.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.