Indiana logo

Indiana

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.0%Indiana
74.0%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -6.5
PROJECTED TOTAL151.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -285
UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIndiana 72
Projected Total151.1
Projected ScoreUCLA 79

Team Comparison

58.2MMH Power Index63
116.0Offensive Efficiency115.9
107.1Defensive Efficiency106.9
8.9Net Efficiency9.0
5.2Strength of Schedule5.1
-7.7Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
67.4Tempo66.5
56.0%Effective FG%53.5%
15.1%Turnover Rate13.4%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
35.8%Free Throw Rate33.8%
6.0Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UCLA HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–58.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–107.1), net efficiency (9.0–8.9), recent form (8.0–-7.7).
Indiana COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.0–115.9), strength of schedule (5.2–5.1), shooting efficiency (56.0–53.5).
Final
Indiana logo
Indiana
98—97
UCLA logo
UCLA
Indiana by 1 • 88.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IndianaTEAM STATUCLA
28-66FG30-76
42.0%FG%39.0%
11-343PT7-22
32.0%3PT%32.0%
31-38FT30-34
82.0%FT%88.0%
40Rebounds46
8Offensive Rebounds12
22Assists19
11Turnovers10
3Steals6
4Blocks4
27Fouls27

Player Box Score

Indiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nick DornG488-186-154-570100026
Lamar WilkersonG438-223-115-683000024
Reed BaileyF286-70-012-1365010024
Tucker DeVriesF462-81-44-410701009
Sam AlexisF222-20-03-43002007
Conor EnrightG392-41-30-01720005
Trent SisleyF150-30-03-62000003
Jasai MilesG90-20-10-02000000
UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trent PerryG436-163-610-1071110025
Donovan DentG508-230-38-11611400024
Tyler BilodeauF405-121-37-8111010018
Eric Dailey Jr.G416-110-13-362100015
Xavier BookerF323-71-40-02402007
Jamar BrownG281-61-42-28000005
Brandon WilliamsG151-11-10-03000003
Steven Jamerson IIF10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

88.7Possessions88.7
110.5Offensive Efficiency109.4
109.4Defensive Efficiency110.5
1.1Net Efficiency-1.1
50.8%Effective FG%44.1%
58.3%True Shooting %52.6%
12.6%Turnover Rate11.1%
57.6%Free Throw Rate44.7%
51.5%3-Point Rate28.9%
2.00Assist / Turnover1.90
Game Summary
Indiana won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 88.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.