Illinois logo

Illinois

28-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.4%Illinois
36.6%Nebraska
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIllinois -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEIllinois -173
Nebraska logo

Nebraska

28-7
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIllinois 75
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScoreNebraska 74

Team Comparison

76.5MMH Power Index67
125.0Offensive Efficiency114.4
103.3Defensive Efficiency98.3
21.7Net Efficiency16.1
6.7Strength of Schedule6.1
12.7Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8
66.5Tempo67.3
54.8%Effective FG%55.6%
13.1%Turnover Rate14.4%
39.3%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
33.8%Free Throw Rate26.9%
14.5Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Illinois HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIllinois holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.5–67.0), offensive efficiency (125.0–114.4), net efficiency (21.7–16.1), strength of schedule (6.7–6.1).
Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–103.3), shooting efficiency (55.6–54.8).
Final
Illinois logo
Illinois
78—69
Nebraska logo
Nebraska
Illinois by 9 • 63.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IllinoisTEAM STATNebraska
24-54FG25-59
44.0%FG%42.0%
9-303PT15-35
30.0%3PT%43.0%
21-26FT4-5
81.0%FT%80.0%
40Rebounds27
11Offensive Rebounds6
15Assists17
8Turnovers8
3Steals5
6Blocks2
10Fouls19

Player Box Score

Illinois
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Keaton WaglerG387-154-910-1255200028
Jake DavisF303-63-64-630010013
Tomislav IvisicC325-72-40-083010012
David MirkovicF334-100-32-281000010
Andrej StojakovicG292-70-24-42400008
Zvonimir IvisicC203-30-01-27102007
Ben HumrichousF180-60-60-03112000
Nebraska
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Braden FragerF316-126-122-221000020
Pryce SandfortF385-114-90-050100014
Sam HoibergG365-92-41-266100013
Jamarques LawrenceG254-92-30-003100010
Rienk MastF262-100-31-14500005
Cale JacobsenG192-40-10-02121004
Berke BuyuktuncelF251-41-30-06101003

Advanced Game Stats

63.4Possessions63.4
123.0Offensive Efficiency108.8
108.8Defensive Efficiency123.0
14.2Net Efficiency-14.2
52.8%Effective FG%55.1%
58.8%True Shooting %56.2%
12.6%Turnover Rate12.6%
48.1%Free Throw Rate8.5%
55.6%3-Point Rate59.3%
1.88Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Illinois won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 63.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.