Boston College logo

Boston College

11-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.0%Boston College
99.0%Duke
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuke -29.4
PROJECTED TOTAL141.6
MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -9900
Duke logo

Duke

35-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston College 56
Projected Total141.6
Projected ScoreDuke 85

Team Comparison

45.1MMH Power Index81.7
100.0Offensive Efficiency122.2
104.8Defensive Efficiency95.2
-4.8Net Efficiency27.0
4.8Strength of Schedule7.8
-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7
67.4Tempo66.8
47.1%Effective FG%56.9%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %38.2%
33.2%Free Throw Rate39.0%
-3.3Average Margin18.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY99.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–45.1), offensive efficiency (122.2–100.0), defensive efficiency (95.2–104.8), net efficiency (27.0–-4.8).
Boston College COUNTERS WITHball security (15.4–15.9).
Final
Boston College logo
Boston College
4967
Duke logo
Duke
Duke by 1861.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boston CollegeTEAM STATDuke
20-52FG24-50
38.0%FG%48.0%
5-203PT5-18
25.0%3PT%28.0%
4-9FT14-20
44.0%FT%70.0%
31Rebounds35
7Offensive Rebounds7
8Assists15
12Turnovers9
2Steals10
1Blocks2
13Fouls13

Player Box Score

Boston College
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Fred PayneG387-140-30-052000014
Boden KapkeF233-61-30-05000007
Donald Hand Jr.G332-80-32-23110006
Jason AsemotaF122-42-30-01000006
Jayden HastingsF341-70-12-49001004
Luka ToewsG122-40-10-01200004
Caleb StegerG151-31-30-10010003
Chase ForteG131-31-20-01300003
Aidan ShawG201-30-10-25000002
Duke
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron BoozerF349-171-40-0122500019
Isaiah EvansG314-102-62-323110012
Patrick Ngongba IIC222-51-14-69211009
Caleb FosterG293-41-21-23200008
Dame SarrG192-40-22-22110006
Nikolas KhameniaG181-20-14-50000006
Maliq BrownF242-30-00-03420004
Darren HarrisG91-50-20-01000002
Cayden BoozerG140-00-01-22100001

Advanced Game Stats

61.4Possessions61.4
79.8Offensive Efficiency109.1
109.1Defensive Efficiency79.8
-29.3Net Efficiency29.3
43.3%Effective FG%53.0%
43.5%True Shooting %56.3%
19.6%Turnover Rate14.6%
17.3%Free Throw Rate40.0%
38.5%3-Point Rate36.0%
0.67Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Duke won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 61.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.