Ole Miss logo

Ole Miss

15-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.6%Ole Miss
90.4%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -15.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.2
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -942
Tennessee logo

Tennessee

25-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOle Miss 68
Projected Total152.2
Projected ScoreTennessee 84

Team Comparison

53MMH Power Index68.6
109.2Offensive Efficiency115.8
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.1
-0.3Net Efficiency13.7
5.4Strength of Schedule7.8
-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
69.5Tempo68.1
50.6%Effective FG%51.6%
14.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
28.0%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
33.8%Free Throw Rate38.6%
-0.2Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–53.0), offensive efficiency (115.8–109.2), defensive efficiency (102.1–109.5), net efficiency (13.7–-0.3).
Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHball security (14.0–17.3).
Final
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
66—84
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
Tennessee by 18 • 64.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Ole MissTEAM STATTennessee
22-52FG26-58
42.0%FG%45.0%
9-253PT9-24
36.0%3PT%38.0%
13-21FT23-34
62.0%FT%68.0%
23Rebounds40
7Offensive Rebounds17
7Assists17
9Turnovers8
6Steals7
4Blocks1
27Fouls18

Player Box Score

Ole Miss
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Patton PinkinsG365-93-62-210100015
AJ StorrG236-141-32-341100015
Ilias KamardineG284-83-60-011000011
Eduardo KlafkeG163-41-23-621000010
Malik DiaF191-60-15-71120007
Kezza GiffaG41-11-10-01100003
Augusto CassiáF181-40-20-14112002
Niko BundaloF41-10-00-01000002
Koren JohnsonG110-20-11-23100001
James ScottF170-00-00-01001000
Travis PerryG120-30-30-01010000
Corey ChestF110-00-00-00001000
Max SmithG10-00-00-00000000
Tennessee
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate AmentF339-152-48-1064000028
Ja'Kobi GillespieG345-135-105-833200020
J.P. EstrellaF355-90-02-491100012
Bishop BoswellG332-51-45-885300010
DeWayne Brown IIF222-60-01-23111005
Jaylen CareyF162-50-10-05100004
Troy HendersonG81-21-20-00100003
Amari EvansG170-20-22-22100002
Ethan BurgG10-00-00-00000000
Clarence MassambaG10-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.6Possessions64.6
102.2Offensive Efficiency130.0
130.0Defensive Efficiency102.2
-27.9Net Efficiency27.9
51.0%Effective FG%52.6%
53.2%True Shooting %56.6%
14.1%Turnover Rate12.3%
40.4%Free Throw Rate58.6%
48.1%3-Point Rate41.4%
0.78Assist / Turnover2.13
Game Summary
Tennessee won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 64.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.