
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.2%Creighton
64.8%Georgetown
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGeorgetown -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL141.3
MODEL MONEYLINEGeorgetown -184

Georgetown
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 68
Projected Total141.3
Projected ScoreGeorgetown 73
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index51.5
109.0Offensive Efficiency107.2
109.5Defensive Efficiency107.4
-0.5Net Efficiency-0.2
5.1Strength of Schedule4.4
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8
68.9Tempo61.7
53.0%Effective FG%49.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate16.4%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
29.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-0.3Average Margin-0.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Georgetown HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGeorgetown holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.5–50.6), defensive efficiency (107.4–109.5), net efficiency (-0.2–-0.5), recent form (-4.8–-5.2).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.0–107.2), strength of schedule (5.1–4.4), shooting efficiency (53.0–49.2).