Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.3%Texas A&M

85.7%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -11.1

PROJECTED TOTAL169.9

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -599

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 79

Projected Total169.9

Projected ScoreAlabama 91

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricAlabama

58MMH Power Index69.5

116.1Offensive Efficiency121.6

108.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

7.7Net Efficiency10.4

4.8Strength of Schedule9.4

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

69.1Tempo74.7

53.5%Effective FG%54.9%

14.8%Turnover Rate13.0%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

37.5%Free Throw Rate36.9%

5.3Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–58.0), offensive efficiency (121.6–116.1), net efficiency (10.4–7.7), strength of schedule (9.4–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–111.2), free throw rate (37.5–36.9).

Final

Texas A&M

97—100

Alabama

Alabama by 3 • 78.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATAlabama

32-65FG31-69

49.0%FG%45.0%

13-313PT16-48

42.0%3PT%33.0%

20-28FT22-32

71.0%FT%69.0%

36Rebounds44

5Offensive Rebounds13

22Assists19

6Turnovers6

6Steals6

2Blocks4

26Fouls19

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	28	7-15	2-6	5-10	3	3	1	1	21
Marcus Hill	G	24	8-13	2-6	0-1	6	1	1	0	18
Rylan Griffen	G	30	3-5	3-5	8-9	6	2	0	0	17
Jamie Vinson	F	8	4-5	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	1	9
Jacari Lane	G	28	2-7	0-3	4-4	3	5	1	0	8
Pop Isaacs	G	15	3-9	1-3	0-0	4	2	0	0	7
Josh Holloway	G	11	2-3	1-1	2-2	2	4	1	0	7
Zach Clemence	F	16	2-2	2-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Ali Dibba	G	14	1-4	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Rubén Dominguez	G	22	0-2	0-2	1-2	3	4	1	0	1
Federiko Federiko	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aden Holloway	G	34	5-11	1-6	9-12	6	4	1	0	20
Labaron Philon Jr.	G	36	7-13	3-7	0-0	4	3	2	0	17
Latrell Wrightsell	G	33	6-14	4-11	0-0	2	3	0	0	16
Amari Allen	F	30	4-10	2-8	2-4	7	6	2	0	12
Houston Mallette	G	14	4-9	4-8	0-0	5	1	0	0	12
London Jemison	F	12	4-6	2-4	0-1	4	0	0	0	10
Aiden Sherrell	F	22	0-4	0-3	8-8	8	1	1	3	8
Charles Bediako	C	19	1-2	0-1	3-7	4	1	0	1	5

Advanced Game Stats

78.3Possessions78.3

123.9Offensive Efficiency127.7

127.7Defensive Efficiency123.9

-3.8Net Efficiency3.8

59.2%Effective FG%56.5%

61.9%True Shooting %59.4%

7.6%Turnover Rate7.8%

43.1%Free Throw Rate46.4%

47.7%3-Point Rate69.6%

3.67Assist / Turnover3.17

Game Summary

Alabama won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 78.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.