Oregon logo

Oregon

12-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.9%Oregon
96.1%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -20.6
PROJECTED TOTAL150.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -2464
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOregon 65
Projected Total150.2
Projected ScorePurdue 85

Team Comparison

48.9MMH Power Index73.2
106.4Offensive Efficiency124.8
110.7Defensive Efficiency107.8
-4.3Net Efficiency17.0
6.0Strength of Schedule7.6
-6.7Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
66.7Tempo65.4
49.9%Effective FG%57.8%
17.8%Turnover Rate13.7%
31.6%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
36.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%
-2.9Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–48.9), offensive efficiency (124.8–106.4), defensive efficiency (107.8–110.7), net efficiency (17.0–-4.3).
Oregon COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.9–29.1).
Final
Oregon logo
Oregon
6468
Purdue logo
Purdue
Purdue by 466.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OregonTEAM STATPurdue
24-54FG22-47
44.0%FG%47.0%
5-253PT5-18
20.0%3PT%28.0%
11-16FT19-25
69.0%FT%76.0%
28Rebounds32
7Offensive Rebounds8
14Assists15
13Turnovers14
12Steals5
1Blocks
21Fouls14

Player Box Score

Oregon
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate BittleC346-141-810-1452010023
Takai SimpkinsG366-132-70-033400014
Wei LinG183-81-50-01310007
Kwame Evans Jr.F292-70-21-27320005
Sean StewartF332-40-00-07230004
Dezdrick LindsayF152-30-00-02010004
Drew CarterG121-11-10-01100003
Jamari PhillipsG111-20-10-00000002
Oleksandr KobzystyiF41-20-10-01010002
Luke JohnsonF80-00-00-00000000
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Fletcher LoyerG324-73-47-842100018
Braden SmithG385-121-42-344100013
Trey Kaufman-RennF284-80-04-584100012
Daniel JacobsenC203-30-03-34000009
Jack BenterG122-31-20-11010005
Omer MayerG141-30-22-32110004
Oscar CluffC201-30-01-22000003
C.J. CoxG211-40-30-03300002
Gicarri HarrisG151-40-30-01100002

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3
96.5Offensive Efficiency102.6
102.6Defensive Efficiency96.5
-6.0Net Efficiency6.0
49.1%Effective FG%52.1%
51.9%True Shooting %57.7%
19.2%Turnover Rate21.6%
29.6%Free Throw Rate53.2%
46.3%3-Point Rate38.3%
1.08Assist / Turnover1.07
Game Summary
Purdue won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.