Alabama logo

Alabama

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.5%Alabama
48.5%Auburn
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAuburn -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL174.2
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -106
Auburn logo

Auburn

21-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama 87
Projected Total174.2
Projected ScoreAuburn 87

Team Comparison

69.5MMH Power Index64.4
121.6Offensive Efficiency118.8
111.2Defensive Efficiency113.0
10.4Net Efficiency5.8
9.4Strength of Schedule7.5
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
74.7Tempo69.8
54.9%Effective FG%53.1%
13.0%Turnover Rate14.5%
32.1%Offensive Rebound %36.5%
36.9%Free Throw Rate43.8%
7.7Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–64.4), offensive efficiency (121.6–118.8), defensive efficiency (111.2–113.0), net efficiency (10.4–5.8).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (36.5–32.1), free throw rate (43.8–36.9).
Final
Alabama logo
Alabama
96—92
Auburn logo
Auburn
Alabama by 4 • 74.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATAuburn
32-59FG33-71
54.0%FG%46.0%
12-233PT9-28
52.0%3PT%32.0%
20-23FT17-22
87.0%FT%77.0%
30Rebounds35
7Offensive Rebounds14
17Assists12
14Turnovers5
5Steals9
7Blocks4
19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Labaron Philon Jr.G337-153-68-956120025
Amari AllenF355-83-54-464000017
Aden HollowayG315-121-34-524100015
Charles BediakoC225-50-02-330100012
London JemisonF153-51-30-03100007
Aiden SherrellF242-60-02-23104006
Houston MalletteG222-32-30-03010006
Latrell WrightsellG112-31-10-00110005
Taylor Bol BowenF71-21-20-01001003
Auburn
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tahaad PettifordG349-163-84-437000025
Keyshawn HallF348-221-67-931320024
Kevin OvertonG385-104-73-451000017
KeShawn MurphyF276-101-20-0122100013
Sebastian Williams-AdamsF333-60-20-03131006
Elyjah FreemanG161-30-23-41010005
Filip JovicF131-10-00-12011002
Blake MuschalekG50-30-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.7Possessions74.7
128.5Offensive Efficiency123.2
123.2Defensive Efficiency128.5
5.4Net Efficiency-5.4
64.4%Effective FG%52.8%
68.6%True Shooting %56.5%
18.2%Turnover Rate6.9%
39.0%Free Throw Rate31.0%
39.0%3-Point Rate39.4%
1.21Assist / Turnover2.40
Game Summary
Alabama won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 74.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Effective FG%, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.