
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.4%Tennessee
49.6%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -0.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -102

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 77
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreKentucky 77
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index63.9
115.8Offensive Efficiency115.2
102.1Defensive Efficiency106.3
13.7Net Efficiency8.9
7.8Strength of Schedule8.7
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.1Tempo69.9
51.6%Effective FG%53.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.4%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
38.6%Free Throw Rate38.0%
9.3Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–63.9), offensive efficiency (115.8–115.2), defensive efficiency (102.1–106.3), net efficiency (13.7–8.9).
Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (8.7–7.8), shooting efficiency (53.2–51.6), ball security (15.4–17.3).