Purdue

30-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.5%Purdue

45.5%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL149.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -120

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePurdue 74

Projected Total149.2

Projected ScoreNebraska 75

Team Comparison

PurdueMetricNebraska

73.2MMH Power Index67

124.8Offensive Efficiency114.4

107.8Defensive Efficiency98.3

17.0Net Efficiency16.1

7.6Strength of Schedule6.1

11.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

65.4Tempo67.3

57.8%Effective FG%55.6%

13.7%Turnover Rate14.4%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.1%Free Throw Rate26.9%

11.1Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–67.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–114.4), net efficiency (17.0–16.1), strength of schedule (7.6–6.1).

Nebraska COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.3–107.8).

Final

Purdue

80—77

Nebraska

Purdue by 3 • 76.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PurdueTEAM STATNebraska

28-76FG26-59

37.0%FG%44.0%

13-463PT12-32

28.0%3PT%38.0%

11-20FT13-20

55.0%FT%65.0%

54Rebounds37

21Offensive Rebounds6

21Assists21

11Turnovers14

8Steals4

3Blocks1

17Fouls19

Player Box Score

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fletcher Loyer	G	41	5-20	4-17	4-5	3	3	1	0	18
Braden Smith	G	40	5-15	3-9	0-1	8	10	2	1	13
Oscar Cluff	C	30	5-9	0-0	2-5	14	2	0	2	12
C.J. Cox	G	30	4-13	3-10	0-2	2	3	1	0	11
Jack Benter	G	19	2-5	1-3	2-2	4	1	2	0	7
Gicarri Harris	G	13	2-4	1-3	2-2	0	0	1	0	7
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	36	3-5	0-1	0-1	19	2	0	0	6
Omer Mayer	G	11	1-4	1-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Daniel Jacobsen	C	5	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	3

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rienk Mast	F	34	6-13	4-7	2-4	6	7	0	0	18
Jamarques Lawrence	G	37	6-9	2-3	2-2	5	4	0	0	16
Pryce Sandfort	F	39	4-12	2-9	5-6	5	1	1	0	15
Sam Hoiberg	G	39	2-7	1-3	3-4	5	6	1	0	8
Braden Frager	F	33	3-8	1-4	0-0	5	2	0	0	7
Cale Jacobsen	G	14	2-3	2-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	6
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	24	2-4	0-2	1-4	5	0	2	1	5
Jared Garcia	F	5	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

76.0Possessions76.0

105.3Offensive Efficiency101.3

101.3Defensive Efficiency105.3

3.9Net Efficiency-3.9

45.4%Effective FG%54.2%

46.8%True Shooting %56.2%

14.6%Turnover Rate18.3%

26.3%Free Throw Rate33.9%

60.5%3-Point Rate54.2%

1.91Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Purdue won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 76.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.