Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.8%Vanderbilt

50.2%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -0.5

PROJECTED TOTAL166.0

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -101

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 83

Projected Total166.0

Projected ScoreAuburn 83

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricAuburn

68.9MMH Power Index64.4

120.9Offensive Efficiency118.8

105.7Defensive Efficiency113.0

15.2Net Efficiency5.8

7.4Strength of Schedule7.5

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

70.9Tempo69.8

55.3%Effective FG%53.1%

13.5%Turnover Rate14.5%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

39.3%Free Throw Rate43.8%

10.8Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–64.4), offensive efficiency (120.9–118.8), defensive efficiency (105.7–113.0), net efficiency (15.2–5.8).

Auburn COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.5–7.4), recent form (8.0–2.7), offensive rebounding (36.5–30.8).

Final

Vanderbilt

84—76

Auburn

Vanderbilt by 8 • 64.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATAuburn

25-54FG24-60

46.0%FG%40.0%

8-233PT7-17

35.0%3PT%41.0%

26-30FT21-27

87.0%FT%78.0%

27Rebounds36

10Offensive Rebounds18

14Assists9

7Turnovers8

2Steals2

6Blocks3

22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	39	6-16	1-4	12-13	4	6	2	0	25
Jalen Washington	C	28	7-8	2-2	6-6	5	0	0	1	22
Devin McGlockton	F	23	4-4	2-2	2-2	7	3	0	3	12
Tyler Nickel	F	33	3-12	2-8	2-2	1	1	0	0	10
Chandler Bing	G	32	3-6	0-2	2-3	1	0	0	0	8
AK Okereke	F	25	2-5	1-3	2-4	3	3	0	1	7
Mike James	G	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Tyler Harris	F	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Jayden Leverett	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tahaad Pettiford	G	36	7-18	1-6	6-7	2	4	0	0	21
Keyshawn Hall	F	26	3-13	3-5	4-5	3	1	0	0	13
KeShawn Murphy	F	24	3-5	0-0	6-6	6	1	1	2	12
Sebastian Williams-Adams	F	37	4-9	1-2	2-4	6	1	0	1	11
Kevin Overton	G	30	4-6	2-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	10
Elyjah Freeman	G	28	1-5	0-0	3-4	8	1	1	0	5
Filip Jovic	F	16	2-4	0-0	0-1	4	1	0	0	4
Simon Walker	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1

131.0Offensive Efficiency118.6

118.6Defensive Efficiency131.0

12.5Net Efficiency-12.5

53.7%Effective FG%45.8%

61.5%True Shooting %52.2%

10.7%Turnover Rate12.7%

55.6%Free Throw Rate45.0%

42.6%3-Point Rate28.3%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.13

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.