
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.4%Creighton
56.6%DePaul
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDePaul -3.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.9
MODEL MONEYLINEDePaul -130

DePaul
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 71
Projected Total145.9
Projected ScoreDePaul 75
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index48.4
109.0Offensive Efficiency103.7
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.7
-0.5Net Efficiency1.0
5.1Strength of Schedule2.0
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.6
68.9Tempo67.7
53.0%Effective FG%49.9%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.8%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %29.7%
29.0%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-0.3Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Creighton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCreighton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.6–48.4), offensive efficiency (109.0–103.7), strength of schedule (5.1–2.0), recent form (-5.2–-6.6).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–109.5), net efficiency (1.0–-0.5), offensive rebounding (29.7–26.6).