Alabama logo

Alabama

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
79.1%Alabama
20.9%Ole Miss
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -7.1
PROJECTED TOTAL167.9
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -378
Ole Miss logo

Ole Miss

15-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama 88
Projected Total167.9
Projected ScoreOle Miss 80

Team Comparison

69.5MMH Power Index53
121.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
111.2Defensive Efficiency109.5
10.4Net Efficiency-0.3
9.4Strength of Schedule5.4
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.3
74.7Tempo69.5
54.9%Effective FG%50.6%
13.0%Turnover Rate14.0%
32.1%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
36.9%Free Throw Rate33.8%
7.7Average Margin-0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–53.0), offensive efficiency (121.6–109.2), net efficiency (10.4–-0.3), strength of schedule (9.4–5.4).
Ole Miss COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.5–111.2).
Final
Alabama logo
Alabama
93—74
Ole Miss logo
Ole Miss
Alabama by 19 • 73.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATOle Miss
26-66FG29-69
39.0%FG%42.0%
17-453PT8-22
38.0%3PT%36.0%
24-26FT8-13
92.0%FT%62.0%
44Rebounds39
11Offensive Rebounds9
20Assists19
6Turnovers8
7Steals2
5Blocks4
15Fouls20

Player Box Score

Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Latrell WrightsellG317-147-130-033000021
Labaron Philon Jr.G304-111-49-1053100018
Aiden SherrellF254-71-26-660120015
Amari AllenF274-63-52-286320013
Aden HollowayG254-112-62-246000012
Houston MalletteG221-81-82-23210005
Jalil BetheaG51-21-22-20000005
Taylor Bol BowenF151-41-40-04001003
London JemisonF150-30-11-21000001
Noah WilliamsonC50-00-00-00010000
Ole Miss
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
AJ StorrG2510-172-35-523100027
Eduardo KlafkeG315-80-12-290020012
Travis PerryG173-53-40-01100009
Corey ChestF93-30-00-20000006
Ilias KamardineG252-81-50-05510005
Patton PinkinsG252-91-20-02200005
Koren JohnsonG192-61-20-01300005
James ScottF111-10-01-21000003
Malik DiaF81-60-10-25100002
Zach DayG160-30-30-06102000
Augusto CassiáF120-20-00-03300000
Niko BundaloF10-00-00-00000000
Max SmithG10-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

73.8Possessions73.8
126.0Offensive Efficiency100.3
100.3Defensive Efficiency126.0
25.7Net Efficiency-25.7
52.3%Effective FG%47.8%
59.3%True Shooting %49.2%
8.2%Turnover Rate10.8%
39.4%Free Throw Rate18.8%
68.2%3-Point Rate31.9%
3.33Assist / Turnover2.38
Game Summary
Alabama won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 73.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.