
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.3%Stonehill
57.7%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADChicago State -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEChicago State -136

Chicago State
7-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 68
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreChicago State 69
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index36.1
97.5Offensive Efficiency99.4
100.7Defensive Efficiency114.9
-3.2Net Efficiency-15.5
-5.4Strength of Schedule0.5
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
68.1Tempo66.2
48.0%Effective FG%45.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.8%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
29.2%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-2.2Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stonehill HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–36.1), defensive efficiency (100.7–114.9), net efficiency (-3.2–-15.5), recent form (-3.4–-4.3).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (99.4–97.5), strength of schedule (0.5–-5.4), ball security (15.8–19.1).