Vermont logo

Vermont

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.8%Vermont
14.2%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVermont -10.0
PROJECTED TOTAL139.3
MODEL MONEYLINEVermont -604
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVermont 75
Projected Total139.3
Projected ScoreBinghamton 65

Team Comparison

53.1MMH Power Index32.4
112.2Offensive Efficiency102.2
104.7Defensive Efficiency112.3
7.5Net Efficiency-10.1
-4.4Strength of Schedule-6.0
12.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
65.4Tempo64.2
54.1%Effective FG%51.3%
14.4%Turnover Rate18.5%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
32.4%Free Throw Rate42.8%
4.9Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vermont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVermont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.1–32.4), offensive efficiency (112.2–102.2), defensive efficiency (104.7–112.3), net efficiency (7.5–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (42.8–32.4).
Final
Vermont logo
Vermont
7365
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
Vermont by 865.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VermontTEAM STATBinghamton
29-53FG24-52
55.0%FG%46.0%
3-203PT7-15
15.0%3PT%47.0%
12-18FT10-16
67.0%FT%63.0%
33Rebounds25
7Offensive Rebounds5
10Assists10
9Turnovers13
6Steals4
1Blocks
19Fouls18

Player Box Score

Vermont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Gus YaldenF308-130-32-295000018
TJ HurleyG345-91-42-250100013
Sean BlakeG324-61-22-232300011
Noah BarnettF215-60-00-410010010
Lucas MariG293-71-42-42020009
TJ LongG272-70-44-45200008
Ben JohnsonG192-40-20-04100004
Momo NkugwaG70-10-10-02000000
Ben MichaelsF10-00-00-00000000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jackson BenigniG335-65-60-020100015
Jeremiah QuigleyG405-131-13-327000014
Bryson WilsonG345-80-02-421100012
Zyier BeverlyF234-80-12-241000010
Stephan SnaggF163-40-01-32010007
Jake BlackburnG141-41-32-43000005
Wes Peterson Jr.G401-80-30-07110002
Nevin IbrociG00-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6
111.3Offensive Efficiency99.1
99.1Defensive Efficiency111.3
12.2Net Efficiency-12.2
57.5%Effective FG%52.9%
59.3%True Shooting %54.5%
14.2%Turnover Rate19.2%
34.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%
37.7%3-Point Rate28.8%
1.11Assist / Turnover0.77
Game Summary
Vermont won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.