
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.6%Hofstra
47.4%Charleston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -111

Charleston
21-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 73
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreCharleston 73
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index53.8
114.0Offensive Efficiency109.2
100.9Defensive Efficiency106.2
13.1Net Efficiency3.0
-2.9Strength of Schedule1.9
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.9
66.2Tempo69.1
52.2%Effective FG%50.6%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
32.0%Free Throw Rate42.1%
8.7Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–109.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.2), net efficiency (13.1–3.0).
Charleston COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-2.9), ball security (15.4–16.1), free throw rate (42.1–32.0).