William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.7%William & Mary

28.3%Northeastern

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -5.7

PROJECTED TOTAL162.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -253

Northeastern

8-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 84

Projected Total162.4

Projected ScoreNortheastern 78

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricNortheastern

53.8MMH Power Index40.9

112.5Offensive Efficiency107.1

105.2Defensive Efficiency115.7

7.3Net Efficiency-8.6

-1.5Strength of Schedule2.7

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.0

73.9Tempo69.9

55.3%Effective FG%52.7%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.4%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

45.3%Free Throw Rate29.9%

5.4Average Margin-6.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–40.9), offensive efficiency (112.5–107.1), defensive efficiency (105.2–115.7), net efficiency (7.3–-8.6).

Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

94—67

Northeastern

William & Mary by 27 • 69.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATNortheastern

35-64FG26-62

55.0%FG%42.0%

12-223PT8-30

55.0%3PT%27.0%

12-19FT7-9

63.0%FT%78.0%

39Rebounds31

11Offensive Rebounds9

27Assists14

8Turnovers12

6Steals6

3Blocks8

10Fouls16

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cade Haskins	F	25	6-12	5-8	0-0	3	3	1	0	17
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	18	5-6	1-1	3-4	3	0	1	0	14
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	26	5-10	2-4	0-0	6	6	0	1	12
Kyle Pulliam	G	26	3-8	0-3	2-4	5	3	1	0	8
Chase Lowe	G	25	4-6	0-0	0-1	8	4	1	0	8
Reese Miller	G	21	3-4	1-1	1-1	1	4	0	0	8
Jo'el Emanuel	F	20	3-6	0-0	1-4	3	2	1	0	7
Kilian Brockhoff	F	15	2-4	1-2	2-2	2	2	0	0	7
Kyle Frazier	G	8	1-1	1-1	3-3	2	0	0	0	6
Finn Lally	F	14	2-5	1-2	0-0	3	3	1	2	5
Colin Ndaw	G	2	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Northeastern

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Xavier Abreu	G	37	10-21	3-9	1-2	3	1	0	1	24
Ryan Williams	G	25	5-11	3-7	2-2	1	5	2	0	15
Mike Loughnane	G	32	3-10	1-6	1-1	3	1	1	1	8
Luca Soroa Schaller	G	27	3-5	0-1	2-2	5	1	1	1	8
Youri Fritz	F	22	3-5	0-1	1-2	7	0	0	2	7
JB Frankel	G	29	1-6	1-5	0-0	4	5	1	0	3
Ty Francis	F	16	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	2	2
Petar Pinter	C	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.7Possessions69.7

134.9Offensive Efficiency96.1

96.1Defensive Efficiency134.9

38.7Net Efficiency-38.7

64.1%Effective FG%48.4%

64.4%True Shooting %50.5%

11.4%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.7%Free Throw Rate14.5%

34.4%3-Point Rate48.4%

3.38Assist / Turnover1.17

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 69.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.