UT Martin

22-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%UT Martin

54.4%Lindenwood

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLindenwood -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL141.5

MODEL MONEYLINELindenwood -119

Lindenwood

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Martin 70

Projected Total141.5

Projected ScoreLindenwood 72

Team Comparison

UT MartinMetricLindenwood

49.8MMH Power Index46.8

103.8Offensive Efficiency105.5

94.0Defensive Efficiency98.6

9.8Net Efficiency6.9

-4.8Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4

67.2Tempo73.7

49.5%Effective FG%50.2%

21.4%Turnover Rate18.3%

37.9%Offensive Rebound %34.0%

37.5%Free Throw Rate37.9%

6.6Average Margin5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–46.8), defensive efficiency (94.0–98.6), net efficiency (9.8–6.9), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.5–103.8), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.5), ball security (18.3–21.4).

Final

UT Martin

74—75

Lindenwood

Lindenwood by 1 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATLindenwood

27-53FG30-54

51.0%FG%56.0%

9-233PT4-17

39.0%3PT%24.0%

11-21FT11-14

52.0%FT%79.0%

29Rebounds30

11Offensive Rebounds8

16Assists17

17Turnovers17

14Steals10

4Blocks1

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Filip Radakovic	G	19	5-9	0-1	3-5	0	1	1	0	13
Andrija Bukumirovic	F	28	4-7	0-0	3-7	6	0	1	1	11
AJ Hopkins	F	20	3-7	2-6	2-3	3	1	1	0	10
Pedro Santos	G	19	4-6	1-2	0-0	3	2	5	0	9
Afan Trnka	G	23	2-7	1-4	3-5	3	9	1	0	8
Luca Colceag	F	16	3-5	2-4	0-0	4	0	2	0	8
Matas Deniusas	F	27	2-4	1-3	0-0	2	1	2	1	5
Filip Petkovski	G	23	2-3	1-2	0-0	2	2	0	0	5
Vladimir Khryapa	F	11	1-1	1-1	0-1	1	0	1	0	3
Lamine Niang	F	13	1-4	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2	2
Damien King	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jadis Jones	G	37	8-11	0-0	6-6	5	3	1	0	22
Dontrez Williams	G	37	8-19	0-5	1-2	6	5	6	0	17
Milos Nenadic	C	29	5-6	0-1	0-2	5	0	1	0	10
Anias Futrell	G	24	3-7	1-5	2-2	3	2	0	1	9
Clayton Jackson	G	26	3-5	2-3	0-0	1	2	1	0	8
Mekhi Cooper	G	36	2-5	1-3	2-2	7	5	1	0	7
Robert Lewis	F	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4

106.6Offensive Efficiency108.1

108.1Defensive Efficiency106.6

-1.4Net Efficiency1.4

59.4%Effective FG%59.3%

58.8%True Shooting %61.8%

24.6%Turnover Rate24.4%

39.6%Free Throw Rate25.9%

43.4%3-Point Rate31.5%

0.94Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Lindenwood won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.