
Villanova
24-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.6%Villanova
38.4%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVillanova -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.4
MODEL MONEYLINEVillanova -160

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVillanova 77
Projected Total151.4
Projected ScoreCreighton 75
Team Comparison
59.4MMH Power Index50.6
114.7Offensive Efficiency109.0
105.9Defensive Efficiency109.5
8.8Net Efficiency-0.5
4.4Strength of Schedule5.1
-1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
67.3Tempo68.9
53.9%Effective FG%53.0%
15.0%Turnover Rate16.6%
31.8%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
31.4%Free Throw Rate29.0%
5.9Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Villanova HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVillanova holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.4–50.6), offensive efficiency (114.7–109.0), defensive efficiency (105.9–109.5), net efficiency (8.8–-0.5).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–4.4).