UCLA logo

UCLA

24-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.6%UCLA
92.4%Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMichigan -17.6
PROJECTED TOTAL155.6
MODEL MONEYLINEMichigan -1216
Michigan logo

Michigan

36-3
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUCLA 69
Projected Total155.6
Projected ScoreMichigan 87

Team Comparison

63MMH Power Index80.9
115.9Offensive Efficiency122.3
106.9Defensive Efficiency97.0
9.0Net Efficiency25.3
5.1Strength of Schedule8.7
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency17.2
66.5Tempo71.8
53.5%Effective FG%58.8%
13.4%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %34.6%
33.8%Free Throw Rate38.9%
6.0Average Margin18.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Michigan HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMichigan holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (80.9–63.0), offensive efficiency (122.3–115.9), defensive efficiency (97.0–106.9), net efficiency (25.3–9.0).
UCLA COUNTERS WITHball security (13.4–16.4).
Final
UCLA logo
UCLA
56—86
Michigan logo
Michigan
Michigan by 30 • 64.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATMichigan
22-58FG31-50
38.0%FG%62.0%
6-213PT7-19
29.0%3PT%37.0%
6-12FT17-26
50.0%FT%65.0%
29Rebounds30
13Offensive Rebounds7
7Assists18
13Turnovers9
5Steals5
1Blocks6
22Fouls11

Player Box Score

UCLA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trent PerryG335-91-23-441100014
Tyler BilodeauF354-122-40-060000010
Donovan DentG335-120-30-214200010
Skyy ClarkG162-42-32-20100008
Xavier BookerF182-71-60-22010005
Steven Jamerson IIF162-20-00-02001004
Eric Dailey Jr.G141-50-01-22000003
Jamar BrownG241-40-10-04110002
Brandon WilliamsG80-10-10-00000000
Eric FreenyG30-20-10-00000000
Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF304-82-37-1081120017
Morez Johnson Jr.F246-60-03-331300015
L.J. CasonG205-82-41-102000013
Nimari BurnettG195-92-60-102000012
Elliot CadeauG263-50-23-51500009
Aday MaraC233-60-13-68303009
Roddy Gayle Jr.G242-21-10-03310005
Will TschetterF112-20-00-04001004
Trey McKenneyG201-40-20-01100002
Oscar GoodmanF30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1
87.4Offensive Efficiency134.2
134.2Defensive Efficiency87.4
-46.8Net Efficiency46.8
43.1%Effective FG%69.0%
44.0%True Shooting %69.0%
20.4%Turnover Rate14.0%
20.7%Free Throw Rate52.0%
36.2%3-Point Rate38.0%
0.54Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
Michigan won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.