
LSU
15-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.8%LSU
89.2%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL157.1
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -826

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 72
Projected Total157.1
Projected ScoreTennessee 86
Team Comparison
54.2MMH Power Index68.6
115.5Offensive Efficiency115.8
111.3Defensive Efficiency102.1
4.2Net Efficiency13.7
4.5Strength of Schedule7.8
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
70.5Tempo68.1
53.4%Effective FG%51.6%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
41.9%Free Throw Rate38.6%
2.9Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–54.2), offensive efficiency (115.8–115.5), defensive efficiency (102.1–111.3), net efficiency (13.7–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.4–51.6), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (41.9–38.6).