
Louisville
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.1%Louisville
49.9%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -0.0
PROJECTED TOTAL163.7
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -100

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisville 82
Projected Total163.7
Projected ScoreSMU 82
Team Comparison
67.1MMH Power Index62.5
118.6Offensive Efficiency118.2
102.2Defensive Efficiency109.6
16.4Net Efficiency8.6
6.0Strength of Schedule7.0
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
71.0Tempo71.1
56.9%Effective FG%55.7%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.7%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate31.3%
11.7Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–62.5), offensive efficiency (118.6–118.2), defensive efficiency (102.2–109.6), net efficiency (16.4–8.6).
SMU COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.0–6.0), ball security (15.7–16.8), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.3).