Oklahoma logo

Oklahoma

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.6%Oklahoma
77.4%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -9.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.4
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -342
Tennessee logo

Tennessee

25-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 74
Projected Total157.4
Projected ScoreTennessee 83

Team Comparison

62.1MMH Power Index68.6
119.5Offensive Efficiency115.8
111.6Defensive Efficiency102.1
7.9Net Efficiency13.7
3.2Strength of Schedule7.8
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
69.4Tempo68.1
55.1%Effective FG%51.6%
14.4%Turnover Rate17.3%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
36.2%Free Throw Rate38.6%
5.5Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tennessee HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–62.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–111.6), net efficiency (13.7–7.9), strength of schedule (7.8–3.2).
Oklahoma COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (119.5–115.8), recent form (12.3–3.3), shooting efficiency (55.1–51.6).
Final
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
66—89
Tennessee logo
Tennessee
Tennessee by 23 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OklahomaTEAM STATTennessee
21-46FG33-63
46.0%FG%52.0%
8-213PT5-18
38.0%3PT%28.0%
16-21FT18-25
76.0%FT%72.0%
19Rebounds36
6Offensive Rebounds15
10Assists22
15Turnovers7
4Steals10
3Blocks5
18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Oklahoma
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nijel PackG327-94-52-220000020
Tae DavisF325-100-12-532100012
Derrion ReidF242-50-26-861000010
Jadon JonesG172-42-43-32000009
Dayton ForsytheG202-50-13-30220007
Xzayvier BrownG282-81-40-01210005
Kuol AtakF61-31-30-00000003
Kai RogersF170-00-00-01102000
Kirill ElatontsevC130-10-10-01100000
Mohamed WagueF100-10-00-01101000
Jeff NwankwoG10-00-00-00000000
Tennessee
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nate AmentF339-173-78-863110029
Felix OkparaF357-100-04-572020018
Ja'Kobi GillespieG376-162-92-238810016
DeWayne Brown IIF215-60-03-432000013
Jaylen CareyF243-90-01-67200007
Bishop BoswellG252-40-20-05501004
Ethan BurgG91-10-00-00000002
Amari EvansG160-00-00-03010000
Troy HendersonG00-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0
100.0Offensive Efficiency134.8
134.8Defensive Efficiency100.0
-34.8Net Efficiency34.8
54.3%Effective FG%56.3%
59.0%True Shooting %59.4%
23.1%Turnover Rate10.5%
45.7%Free Throw Rate39.7%
45.7%3-Point Rate28.6%
0.67Assist / Turnover3.14
Game Summary
Tennessee won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.