
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.6%Longwood
61.4%Presbyterian
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPresbyterian -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.7
MODEL MONEYLINEPresbyterian -159

Presbyterian
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 73
Projected Total149.7
Projected ScorePresbyterian 76
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index46.6
108.1Offensive Efficiency107.2
103.0Defensive Efficiency106.9
5.1Net Efficiency0.3
-6.4Strength of Schedule-1.6
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.9
71.9Tempo67.5
51.4%Effective FG%52.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate19.3%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
42.0%Free Throw Rate41.1%
3.6Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–46.6), offensive efficiency (108.1–107.2), defensive efficiency (103.0–106.9), net efficiency (5.1–0.3).
Presbyterian COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.6–-6.4), shooting efficiency (52.3–51.4).