Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

33.2%Binghamton

66.8%Bryant

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBryant -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL136.5

MODEL MONEYLINEBryant -201

Bryant

9-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 66

Projected Total136.5

Projected ScoreBryant 71

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricBryant

32.4MMH Power Index34.1

102.2Offensive Efficiency98.6

112.3Defensive Efficiency110.2

-10.1Net Efficiency-11.6

-6.0Strength of Schedule-1.3

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0

64.2Tempo65.8

51.3%Effective FG%48.0%

18.5%Turnover Rate20.0%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

42.8%Free Throw Rate31.2%

-6.5Average Margin-7.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–98.6), net efficiency (-10.1–-11.6), recent form (-6.2–-10.0), shooting efficiency (51.3–48.0).

Bryant COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (34.1–32.4), defensive efficiency (110.2–112.3), strength of schedule (-1.3–-6.0).

Final

Binghamton

79—67

Bryant

Binghamton by 12 • 60.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATBryant

26-44FG24-61

59.0%FG%39.0%

6-113PT9-33

55.0%3PT%27.0%

21-23FT10-11

91.0%FT%91.0%

25Rebounds31

5Offensive Rebounds17

12Assists9

10Turnovers12

8Steals8

—Blocks2

13Fouls17

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jeremiah Quigley	G	40	8-12	0-1	3-3	3	5	2	19
Jackson Benigni	G	29	4-4	3-3	7-8	4	1	1	18
Zyier Beverly	F	22	6-10	0-0	2-2	2	1	3	14
Bryson Wilson	G	36	3-8	0-2	7-8	8	3	2	13
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	40	2-5	2-3	2-2	0	1	0	8
Jake Blackburn	G	15	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	5
Stephan Snagg	F	18	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	2

Bryant

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ty Tabales	G	34	8-17	5-9	0-0	3	2	3	0	21
Keegan Harvey	F	30	7-10	1-3	5-5	6	0	0	1	20
Aaron Davis III	F	35	4-14	3-11	3-4	6	0	1	0	14
Ashley Sims II	F	31	3-7	0-3	0-0	4	1	0	0	6
Khalil Williams	F	26	1-7	0-5	2-2	4	4	2	1	4
Lennart Weber	F	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Timofei Rudovskii	F	20	0-4	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	0
Jakai Robinson	G	18	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.6Possessions60.6

130.4Offensive Efficiency110.6

110.6Defensive Efficiency130.4

19.8Net Efficiency-19.8

65.9%Effective FG%46.7%

71.9%True Shooting %50.6%

16.7%Turnover Rate19.6%

52.3%Free Throw Rate18.0%

25.0%3-Point Rate54.1%

1.20Assist / Turnover0.75

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 60.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.