
Hampton
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.1%Hampton
90.9%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -15.0
PROJECTED TOTAL141.4
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -999

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHampton 63
Projected Total141.4
Projected ScoreHofstra 78
Team Comparison
43.2MMH Power Index59.3
104.3Offensive Efficiency114.0
105.6Defensive Efficiency100.9
-1.3Net Efficiency13.1
-1.7Strength of Schedule-2.9
-12.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
67.0Tempo66.2
47.3%Effective FG%52.2%
16.7%Turnover Rate16.1%
33.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
39.3%Free Throw Rate32.0%
-0.8Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–43.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–104.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.6), net efficiency (13.1–-1.3).
Hampton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.9), free throw rate (39.3–32.0).