
Lindenwood
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.7%Lindenwood
81.3%Tennessee State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee State -8.9
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee State -435

Tennessee State
23-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLindenwood 73
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreTennessee State 82
Team Comparison
46.8MMH Power Index55.4
105.5Offensive Efficiency110.9
98.6Defensive Efficiency102.7
6.9Net Efficiency8.2
-6.8Strength of Schedule-3.1
-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency13.7
73.7Tempo72.4
50.2%Effective FG%50.9%
18.3%Turnover Rate17.0%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %34.8%
37.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%
5.1Average Margin5.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–46.8), offensive efficiency (110.9–105.5), net efficiency (8.2–6.9), strength of schedule (-3.1–-6.8).
Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.6–102.7), free throw rate (37.9–34.7).