Duke

35-3

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

95.5%Duke

4.5%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuke -18.2

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -2122

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDuke 84

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 66

Team Comparison

DukeMetricNotre Dame

81.7MMH Power Index49.7

122.2Offensive Efficiency110.3

95.2Defensive Efficiency111.2

27.0Net Efficiency-0.9

7.8Strength of Schedule4.7

18.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

66.8Tempo68.0

56.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.9%Turnover Rate17.0%

38.2%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

39.0%Free Throw Rate34.7%

18.0Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–49.7), offensive efficiency (122.2–110.3), defensive efficiency (95.2–111.2), net efficiency (27.0–-0.9).

Final

Duke

100—56

Notre Dame

Duke by 44 • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DukeTEAM STATNotre Dame

27-59FG19-52

46.0%FG%37.0%

12-333PT7-26

36.0%3PT%27.0%

34-38FT11-19

89.0%FT%58.0%

49Rebounds27

14Offensive Rebounds5

20Assists9

9Turnovers15

11Steals1

1Blocks—

20Fouls22

Player Box Score

Duke

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Boozer	F	24	5-8	2-2	12-14	13	2	3	0	24
Darren Harris	G	17	4-9	2-5	6-6	2	1	2	0	16
Caleb Foster	G	22	4-6	3-5	2-2	2	3	0	0	13
Patrick Ngongba II	C	15	4-5	0-0	5-6	3	2	0	0	13
Isaiah Evans	G	22	2-7	2-6	4-4	3	3	0	0	10
Cayden Boozer	G	21	3-9	0-4	4-4	3	4	0	0	10
Dame Sarr	G	26	3-6	2-5	0-0	5	0	2	0	8
Nikolas Khamenia	G	22	2-6	1-4	1-2	6	2	0	0	6
Maliq Brown	F	22	0-3	0-2	0-0	10	2	3	1	0
Cameron Sheffield	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Scott	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Cole Certa	G	31	3-11	2-7	6-6	2	1	0	14
Brady Koehler	F	27	5-9	2-5	2-3	5	1	0	14
Sir Mohammed	G	28	5-8	1-1	0-1	2	2	1	11
Matthew MacLellan	F	8	2-2	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	6
Carson Towt	F	24	2-4	0-0	0-2	7	1	0	4
Logan Imes	G	23	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	3
Ryder Frost	F	15	1-6	1-6	0-0	2	1	0	3
Brady Stevens	G	5	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	1
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	27	0-7	0-3	0-1	3	1	0	0
Garrett Sundra	F	12	0-2	0-2	0-2	2	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6

139.7Offensive Efficiency78.2

78.2Defensive Efficiency139.7

61.5Net Efficiency-61.5

55.9%Effective FG%43.3%

64.9%True Shooting %45.9%

12.5%Turnover Rate21.1%

64.4%Free Throw Rate36.5%

55.9%3-Point Rate50.0%

2.22Assist / Turnover0.60

Game Summary

Duke won by 44 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.