Auburn logo

Auburn

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Auburn
56.3%Oklahoma
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOklahoma -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL165.8
MODEL MONEYLINEOklahoma -129
Oklahoma logo

Oklahoma

21-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAuburn 81
Projected Total165.8
Projected ScoreOklahoma 84

Team Comparison

64.4MMH Power Index62.1
118.8Offensive Efficiency119.5
113.0Defensive Efficiency111.6
5.8Net Efficiency7.9
7.5Strength of Schedule3.2
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
69.8Tempo69.4
53.1%Effective FG%55.1%
14.5%Turnover Rate14.4%
36.5%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
43.8%Free Throw Rate36.2%
4.1Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (119.5–118.8), defensive efficiency (111.6–113.0), net efficiency (7.9–5.8), recent form (12.3–8.0).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (64.4–62.1), strength of schedule (7.5–3.2), offensive rebounding (36.5–32.4).
Final
Auburn logo
Auburn
7991
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
Oklahoma by 1266.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AuburnTEAM STATOklahoma
25-53FG30-57
47.0%FG%53.0%
8-193PT13-19
42.0%3PT%68.0%
21-27FT18-25
78.0%FT%72.0%
35Rebounds28
14Offensive Rebounds11
11Assists12
14Turnovers9
6Steals10
7Blocks6
17Fouls21

Player Box Score

Auburn
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kevin OvertonG409-175-103-472000026
Keyshawn HallF327-101-111-1161010026
Elyjah FreemanG302-51-33-44223008
Filip JovicF232-20-03-48320007
Sebastian Williams-AdamsF322-40-00-22013004
Tahaad PettifordG291-91-51-22310004
KeShawn MurphyF142-60-00-03000004
Oklahoma
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nijel PackG298-136-80-012000022
Mohamed WagueF254-70-010-1291440018
Derrion ReidF336-92-22-341000016
Xzayvier BrownG336-112-40-034100014
Jadon JonesG243-53-40-23221009
Dayton ForsytheG201-50-15-62010007
Tae DavisF262-60-00-02210004
Kirill ElatontsevC70-00-01-20011001
Kai RogersF30-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.4Possessions66.4
119.0Offensive Efficiency137.0
137.0Defensive Efficiency119.0
-18.1Net Efficiency18.1
54.7%Effective FG%64.0%
60.0%True Shooting %66.1%
21.3%Turnover Rate13.5%
50.9%Free Throw Rate43.9%
35.8%3-Point Rate33.3%
0.79Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
Oklahoma won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 66.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.