
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%DePaul
68.0%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCreighton -5.0
PROJECTED TOTAL145.9
MODEL MONEYLINECreighton -212

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 70
Projected Total145.9
Projected ScoreCreighton 75
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index50.6
103.7Offensive Efficiency109.0
102.7Defensive Efficiency109.5
1.0Net Efficiency-0.5
2.0Strength of Schedule5.1
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
67.7Tempo68.9
49.9%Effective FG%53.0%
17.8%Turnover Rate16.6%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
36.8%Free Throw Rate29.0%
0.7Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Creighton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCreighton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.6–48.4), offensive efficiency (109.0–103.7), strength of schedule (5.1–2.0), recent form (-5.2–-6.6).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–109.5), net efficiency (1.0–-0.5), offensive rebounding (29.7–26.6).