
Louisville
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.3%Louisville
42.7%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -134

Clemson
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLouisville 74
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScoreClemson 73
Team Comparison
67.1MMH Power Index59.9
118.6Offensive Efficiency112.6
102.2Defensive Efficiency101.4
16.4Net Efficiency11.2
6.0Strength of Schedule4.6
1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.0Tempo63.6
56.9%Effective FG%53.0%
16.8%Turnover Rate14.0%
32.3%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate38.1%
11.7Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.6–112.6), net efficiency (16.4–11.2), strength of schedule (6.0–4.6).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–102.2), ball security (14.0–16.8), free throw rate (38.1–34.1).