
Alabama
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Alabama
60.1%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -151

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama 81
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreTennessee 85
Team Comparison
69.5MMH Power Index68.6
121.6Offensive Efficiency115.8
111.2Defensive Efficiency102.1
10.4Net Efficiency13.7
9.4Strength of Schedule7.8
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
74.7Tempo68.1
54.9%Effective FG%51.6%
13.0%Turnover Rate17.3%
32.1%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
36.9%Free Throw Rate38.6%
7.7Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–68.6), offensive efficiency (121.6–115.8), strength of schedule (9.4–7.8), recent form (9.5–3.3).
Tennessee COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.1–111.2), net efficiency (13.7–10.4), offensive rebounding (44.5–32.1).