
Vanderbilt
27-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.2%Vanderbilt
48.8%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL161.6
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -105

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 81
Projected Total161.6
Projected ScoreKentucky 81
Team Comparison
68.9MMH Power Index63.9
120.9Offensive Efficiency115.2
105.7Defensive Efficiency106.3
15.2Net Efficiency8.9
7.4Strength of Schedule8.7
2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
70.9Tempo69.9
55.3%Effective FG%53.2%
13.5%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
39.3%Free Throw Rate38.0%
10.8Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–63.9), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.3), net efficiency (15.2–8.9).
Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (8.7–7.4), offensive rebounding (33.2–30.8).